Archive for June, 2010

Critical Forum: Sorrow Laughs, an appreciation of Simon Gray by Josephine Hart

Friday, June 18th, 2010

Sorrow Laughs

An appreciation of Simon Gray by Josephine Hart

Published here by kind permission of the author. First printed in the programme for the Donmar Warehouse’s production of The Late Middle Classes, May 2010.

Simon Gray wrote 40 plays – and a number of the wittiest diaries in the English language. He was nominated for and won countless awards – too many to list here – and anyway he would not have approved, having a healthy distrust of “the arrogant oligarchy who merely happen to be walking around”. There was no kidding him and he knew that to write was to sit in judgement on oneself and mostly to find oneself wanting. Anything else was false. And false he never was. He wrote with the perfect poise of a poet, with his ear trained to our voice as he noted every lie. No playwright in modern theatre had a more finely tuned sensibility to the dangerous seduction of what Auden called “the folded lie, the romantic lie in the brain”. In play after play, with scalding vertiginous wit, Simon Gray added to our store of uncomfortable self-knowledge: our terror of the abyss; the utter fragility of normal life; above all our often secret desire to be alone, endlessly thwarted as Larkin noted by the concept that “Virtue is social”; and the torture of love when it turns to something else yet remains shadowed by its own loss. His art acknowledged, as we all must, that whatever personal courage or bravado we bring to it, however we attempt to swagger through it, the art of living and losing is harder than we pretend.

His characters were called into being during years of long nights fuelled by cigarettes and alcohol, alone, typing till dawn, on and on till the morning of ecstasy when a play was finished: “This for me the only moment of pure happiness I ever experience in the playwriting business. I wish there was some ceremony, some physical ceremony to express it – picking it up, turning it upside down, slapping its rump, dishing out cigars…” Plays are indeed a multiple-birth experience – to a perpetual life. In this art it is kinder than the experience it seeks to represent. And what characters he gifted us in those astonishing plays, beginning with Jock, played by Alec Guinness, in Gray’s wildly controversial debut Wise Child.

Ben Butley, in Butley, seemed to respond to Gray’s Pirandello-like invitation, “It’s show time, folks”, and became, in Alan Bates’ seminal performance, a terrifying Nietzschean figure, raging in his love-loathing, life-hating diatribes, culminating in a verbal marital flaying which would give Tarantino pause for thought.

In Otherwise Engaged, Simon Hench’s icy heart beat out Sartre’s mantra, “Hell is other people” with hilarious brutality until our laughter freezes in the waste of cruelty that is the last scene.

St John Quartermaine in Quartermaine’s Terms can only whisper as his seemingly ordered life is almost stolen from him: “Oh Lord!/Well – I say – / Oh Lord!” It was the poetry of defeat (perfectly spoken) in a master-class from Edward Fox.

Close of Play starred Michael Redgrave as Jasper, a character whom, as Gray pointed out, lives in “Hell which turns out to be ‘life, old life itself’”.

Jameson, in The Rear Column, is one of five men isolated in the Congo – waiting, watching in Jeremy Irons’ performance, as civilised behaviour, including his own, collapses. Geographically, the territory may have been alien – the moral issues remain the same – betrayal, particularly the betrayal of self, as demonstrated by six academics adrift, in their own way, on a literary magazine in The Common Pursuit.

In the heartbreaking Japes, the eponymous hero was played by Toby Stephens – his agonising disintegration witnessed by his appalled brother. Charles and Celia, the parents in The Late Middle Classes, are seemingly unaware of their son Holly’s psychological growing pains during his dangerously sentimental education – one which will distort his soul forever. Their elective moral blindness destroys grace – as it almost always does in Gray’s universe.

This warning sounds out in all his plays. It is what gives them their moral tone. Attention must be paid to this above all else. No system is to blame – the fault lies in ourselves. Thus Gray’s work cuts along the nerve – a sometimes painful process. With his natural gift for comic timing, the soaring, thrilling laughter which drenches the plays was also his anaesthetic of choice. There was and is an artistic price to be paid. In the literary arts an almost Orwellian hierarchical system denies the accolade of greatness to work we designate as comedy. In this we are often wrong – forgetting that “Excess of sorrow laughs/excess of joy weeps”.

There is a strange custom in contemporary theatre which ranks the political as of greater consequence than the examination of the human heart in conflict with itself. Truth is timeless, it has no accent and is beyond class and is as easily found in Moliere’s court and Chekov’s dying estates, in Rattigan’s drawing rooms as in Gorky’s lower depths. It lies in the interior and Gray was always on his way to the interior. The exterior was ever only the frame. His plays have little to say about the politics of the day. Arthur Miller shrewdly noted that before a play is – “it is a kind of psychic journalism”, a mirror of its hour – and this reflection of contemporary feeling is precisely what makes many plays irrelevant to later times. What finally survives, when anything does, are archetypal characters and relationships which can be transferred to the new period.

Simon Gray left us a gallery of such characters to see us through life. Their vibrant nature, their thrilling command of language to torment, to seduce, to manipulate, will forever attract our best actors. Indeed few playwrights can number performances from so many artists whom one can truly describe as great. Nor can many boast that much of their work directed with such exquisite precision and celebration by one of theatre’s seminal figures – fellow playwright and Nobel Laureate Harold Pinter: “Life in the theatre has not brought me anything more rewarding than directing Simon Gray’s plays.”

Critical Forum: The Perils of the Playwright by Simon Callow

Monday, June 7th, 2010

The Perils of the Playwright

by Simon Callow

A review of An Unnatural Pursuit and Other Pieces, first printed in The Sunday Times on 1st September 1985.

The review is reprinted in Simon Callow’s book My Life in Pieces, published by Nick Hern Books on 3rd June 2010. For more information visit the Nick Hern Books website. Copied here by kind permission of the author.

Simon Gray is one of those writers whose popular image bears little resemblance to his work. One goes to the theatre expecting a Simon Gray Play, urbane, incestuously bitchy, with a central star-role which knocks everyone else into the ground. Instead one gets extraordinarily complex ensemble pieces full of surreal humour and devastating visions of loneliness, defeat and despair. It is true that the social world and the overall tone of the pieces, with a couple of exceptions, remain the same from play to play, though no more or less than Chekhov – with whom his finest play, Qurtermaine’s Terms, can well stand comparison. In the same manner, and almost equally fine, is his latest play, The Common Pursuit, whose production by Harold Pinter is the subject of the present volume. Or so it would seem. In fact, the lasting impression of An Unnatural Pursuit is of the author himself with a brilliant cameo portrait of Pinter and a number of sharp and savage observations about the businesss of putting on a play thrown in as a bonus.

The bulk of the book is a work-journal, starting with the completion of the play (“I numbered the pages, packed and shaped them into a completed-looking pile, toasted myself with a further gulp of whisky and a few more cigarettes, gloated. This, for me, is the only moment of pure excitement I ever experienced in the playwriting business…”) then following its career through the stages of casting, rehearsal, performance, failure to transfer, and closure. It’s a vivid picture of those particular horrors: the sad series of compromises as you decline from your initial bright dream of the play, not being able to get this theatre, that actor, those dates; the mysterious failure of companies to gell, of rhythms to quite take hold; the wilful blindness of certain critics and the regrettable tendency of the public to listen to them; the terrible brevity of the run if the play doesn’t transfer – so much talent and work and passion squandered.

All this is accurately and wittily described. But the book is more remarkable than mere reportage. For one thing, the playwright’s eye-view is a unique and inherently frustrating vantage point: second, the playwright in question is Simon Gray. By the end of the book we come to know him very well.

“Actually, he’s not nearly such a pain as his self-portrait would have you believe,” says Pinter in his foreword. No indeed, but pain is nevertheless exactly the word: not that inflicted on others – that undergone by himself. The wildly funny accounts he offers of his paranoia, power-mania, anxiety and doubt simply heighten one’s sense of it. Smoking like a beagle, veins throbbing with booze, he pours his nightly confessions in the tape-recorder, a haunted, haggard, positively Dostoievskian figure. En passant, he offers much lucid analysis of his play and the processes that are leading to it realisation. But at any moment, in the midnight stillness of his study, speculation is liable to run riot: why are his actors behaving like talentless buffoons and/or obstreperous Marxists? Why does Pinter want to exclude only his photograph from the programme?

I do actually feel very passionately that the play was written by me. I am the author, and yet the only people who are going to appear in the programme are the actors and the director, with the author, the only begetter, not visible.

After a restless night, he becomes convinced that one of the actors has acquired a lisp:

I formed a plan to watch Nick Le Prevost’s lips like a hawk, and the moment I saw or heard the lisp, to alert Harold to it. He could take it from there . . . I do think the chap who plays Stuart shouldn’t have a lisp. Or a club-foot or a hunchback. At least without giving me a chance to re-write the text.

This is madness, of course (from which, I hasten to say, he always recovers; that is, he knows he’s mad) but it is the divine madness that makes the author of Butley, Otherwise Engaged and Quartermaine’s Terms an infinitely darker, more passionate, less rational artist than the waspish boulevardier of the critics’ report.

There are two areas of legitimate interest to which the book doesn’t address itself: the actual writing of the play; and why, given an excellent cast and a masterly director, it didn’t quite work. Mysteries, both, no doubt. What you do get is the lowdown on the playwright’s relation to the production, and a full length soul-sketch of one of the best living practitioners of that art: in the second section of the book, the Gray of the work-journals is supplemented by the even darker Gray of ‘My Cambridge’, one of the occasional pieces reprinted in the present volume. (The other pieces are the classically hilarious Flops and Other Fragments: an appreciation of Leavis; and two pieces about cricket, upon which I am neither qualified nor going to comment, except to be duly awed by the figure of Lopez, the infant off-spin bowling wizard).

‘My Cambridge’ is an astonishingly bleak account of the author’s academic career, culminating in his years at Cambridge, where his ambition, triumphantly achieved on his own admission, was to be the very thing his harshest critic might accuse him of: “a fluent fraud”. Every anguished and hilarious word of this piece and indeed the whole book refutes that accusation. Death and demons swarm over its pages, held off by fags and booze and love and many, many wonderful jokes. But the somber note echoes through: even Lopez killed himself.

NOTE:

An Unnatural Pursuit & Other Pieces is being republished by Faber on 15th June 2010 in Simon Gray: The Early Diaries. More details can be found HERE. Most of Simon Gray’s stage and television plays will also be republished by Faber on 15th June as Faber Contemporary Classics.

Critical Forum: Simon Gray 1936 – 2008: ‘In Other Words’ by Billy Smart

Monday, June 7th, 2010

Simon Gray 1936 – 2008: ‘In Other Words’

by Billy Smart

(Published in Contemporary Theatre Review Volume 18/4, 2008)

BETH: In other words, you do know.

SIMON: In other words, can’t we confine ourselves to the other words.

(Otherwise Engaged, 1975)

The sadness of the recent death of the playwright Simon Gray has been lightened by the unexpectedly sensitive and thoughtful reappraisal of his work that his passing has encouraged. Had he died ten years ago the response would likely have been much more dismissive.

There are several reasons for this improved standing: public knowledge of anybody’s mortal illness is always likely to encourage the realisation of their value; the continued patronage of Harold Pinter and Peter Hall; a few high-profile and successful revivals (Otherwise Engaged in the West End, Butley on Broadway); and the unexpected appearance and production of new plays, some – notably The Late Middle Classes (1999) and Little Nell (2007) – of the first rank.

Above all, the renewed interest in Simon Gray in the twenty-first century has been due to the publication of four volumes of stream-of consciousness memoirs; The Smoking Diaries (2004), The Year Of The Jouncer (2006), The Last Cigarette and Coda (both 2008), following on from four earlier volumes of theatrical diaries. These memoirs give a real sense of the distinctiveness of Gray’s voice and intelligence, an original quality that they share with the plays; a seemingly artless (but actually extremely precise) sense of wit that works by setting up a reasonable premise, then to then test it, unravel it, look at it from unexpected angles, using seeming logic and reason to demonstrate the constant oddity of life and thought, as in this passage that combines two recurring preoccupations, Harold Pinter and smoking:

To come back to Harold’s problems with smoking. I probably make things more difficult, being a chain-smoker. In previous rehearsals, we’ve chain smoked together. This time, he chews away at his nicotine gum, with the smoke of his cigarettes leaking reminiscently up his nostrils, down into his lungs. On top of that he used to use his cigarettes in rehearsals, taking one deliberately out of the black box (Sobranies) putting it in his mouth, lighting it with a swift gesture, inhaling it deeply, as often as not walking a few paces away to take the cigarette out, study it, put it back in his mouth, inhale. It was a pantomime, an enactment of thought, he was making it clear to everyone that he was thinking, making it clear to himself that he had taken the time to think. Now, without a cigarette to resort to, he finds a lacuna between a question and its answer, which he can only fill with a baffled silence, which leads to further silence and further bafflement as the need to answer looms larger and larger, the people waiting for his answer no doubt seeming to do likewise. He hasn’t yet found an alternative ritual to accompany thought, and I doubt if he’ll find it in his chewing gum. You can’t do much more with chewing gum than put it in your mouth and chew it. At least not without disgusting everybody.1

(An Unnatural Pursuit & Other Pieces, Faber, 1985, pp. 95–6.)

Gray applies this technique to his own life and personal failings with alarming candour: the guilt of adultery and alcoholism, the harshness of his mother, the betrayal of a boyhood friend who went on to commit suicide in adult life. Although the memoirs are consistently funny, they are too frank and honest to be shelved under humour, and it is their emotional effect that remains with the reader. This application of humour, rather than jokes for their own sake, is also how Gray’s plays work. Although a surface response to his plays might be the impression of a sparkling theatrical wit, this wit is always used to serve a deeper purpose of characterisation and insight into the human condition. Where the wit may appear to take the form of smooth and allusive phrasemaking, such as Simon Hench informing an acquaintance incapacitated by unrequited love that he is ‘obviously in the grip of a passion almost Dante-esque in the purity of its hopelessness’, the reference actually serves its comic effect by demonstrating Hench’s awareness of the self-pity and quotidian haplessness of the acquaintance, rather than serving to flatter the audience’s knowledge of Dante. The line is funny not because of the allusion to a classical source, but because the allusion fits and complements the audience’s understanding of the scene’s power dynamics.

How Gray structures this wit makes his jokes deeper than they need to be to elicit laughter, and always work on the level of subtext. In The Common Pursuit (1984), Humphrey replies to a rambling explanation of a mutual friend’s infidelities from Martin (a confused description that is suffixed with a pleading ‘If you follow?’) by saying;

HUMPHREY. Of course I follow. Merely because you can’t speak properly doesn’t mean I can’t understand you. Generally well before you’ve finished.

The devastating precision of Humphrey’s correction of Martin’s inarticulacy might be the part of the speech that initially makes the audience laugh, but it is the extension of the thought (‘Generally well before you’ve finished’) that adds depth to the joke, intimating the wider truth that Humphrey can see and understand that Martin also is having an affair with a different, closer, mutual friend. These are the phantom ‘other words’ of unsayable truth, masked by Gray’s characters who choose to talk in anecdotes or spiraling and freewheeling digression instead (see especially Ben Butley’s sly insults and pastiches). Except that, in Gray’s plays, the inferences and hidden knowledge of the masking other words do always eventually hit home, normally prefacing an event that irrevocably changes circumstances (a pregnancy, an abortion, a departure) making the appalling pain and mess of life unavoidable, however elegant or funny the characters’ coping strategies have been up to that point.

It is this use of language as a mask, and Gray’s depiction of life being governed by betrayal and deceit (often not even deliberately) that must have formed part of the attraction of these works for Harold Pinter, who went on to direct eight of Gray’s plays. Certainly, the works of the two dramatists to seem to be inextricably linked together for a few years in the 1970s, each writer exploring the ideas of adultery, publishing and professional rivalry from a different perspective that is informed by the other’s plays.

Gray was a very prolific author, and perhaps too prolific for the good of his reputation which, with the exception of the shabby-genteel Quartermaine’s Terms (1981), tends to rest on the more metropolitan adultery plays; Butley (1971), Otherwise Engaged and The Common Pursuit. Dig deeper into his body of work, and this impression is soon complicated; Spoiled (1970) a modest and unshowy – but quietly devastating – study of a pederast (insanely produced as a glittering commercial prospect at the Haymarket at the heart of the West End!), the lurid – and possibly unperformable – black farces Wise Child (1967) and Dutch Uncle (1969), and the long cherished project of a play about Dickens, Little Nell. These plays are characterised by phantasmagorical elements when reality seems suddenly to become stranger and less negotiable, an aspect of Gray’s work that tends to be neglected, but is always present as a possibility, and can be found in the sudden and unnerving breakdowns of characters in more ostensibly conventional plays, as in Quartermaine’s Terms and Japes (2000).

Most surprising and exciting of all, though, is The Rear Column (1978). In this remarkable play, Gray’s skills at depicting collegiate rivalry, and emotional detachment and dislocation are placed in the unexpected place and time of the Congo in 1887, when Major Barttelot’s colonial expedition eventually degenerates into a terrifying nightmare of violence and cannibalism (the same series of events which inspired Heart Of Darkness). This was clearly too far a breach from what West End audiences expected from Simon Gray thirty years ago, and the play has laid totally neglected since, awaiting the more sympathetic hearing that is surely its due.

Even without revivals, though, Simon Gray is very likely to be remembered by future generations through his memoirs and diaries. These will serve an important purpose of showing what life was like for the last generation of serious playwrights to have worked in the West End, rather than the subsidized theatre (although he did have one original play produced by the RSC, and one at the National). Something that makes Gray’s memoirs of his theatrical career so compelling for the reader is the combination of tremendous strokes of luck (such as Alec Guinness unexpectedly deciding that he wanted to appear in the West End in drag, or the continual enthusiasm of Pinter and Alan Bates) with calamitous and unexpected misfortunes.

Unsparingly recounted in Gray’s diaries and memoirs, these misfortunes become, in the telling, both very funny and instructive and enlightening. It is chastening to follow him through such unhappy experiences as: knowing that the play that you have heading for the West End is going to be a terrible flop, the self-deception amongst the company that it can be improved, and the appalling afterlife of the production achieving a posthumous infamy (culminating in the ultimate humiliation of its providing the basis for a Daily Mail campaign to reintroduce booing in the theatre); or having an exciting new play blocked from transferring into the West End by the presence of an indifferent revival of one of your old plays; or the backers of your play stabbing you in the back by abandoning the West End transfer of your play while refusing to inform the company; or, most notoriously, hitching the commercial success of your play to a wholly unsuitable star comedian who then has a very public breakdown and suicide attempt; or, as recently as 2007, nobody having the courage to be unkind and sack an insufficiently talented young actor from their Broadway debut until it’s too late.

Gray’s theatrical memoirs illustrate the unexpected vicissitudes and disappointments of life, while the life memoirs tell us much about guilt, betrayal and humiliation. It is a source of hope and wonder that they manage to achieve this while remaining amusing and entertaining. It is to be hoped that Gray’s likely survival in the canon as a memoirist and diarist will keep interest in the plays themselves alive, plays which share the qualities and insights of the autobiographical writing. As Lyn Gardner wrote in Gray’s Guardian obituary (8 August 2008):

Gray bridged the gulf between intellectual and popular drama. Along the way, he provided the West End with some robustly funny and darkly melancholic plays about the failure of hope over experience. Most people can relate to that.

NOTES:

1. An Unnatural Pursuit & Other Pieces is being republished by Faber on 15th June 2010 in Simon Gray: The Early Diaries. More details can be found HERE. Most of Simon Gray’s stage and television plays will also be republished by Faber on 15th June as Faber Contemporary Classics.